Publications of Moles, A.
Surviving the Fight for Academic Freedom: The Case of CEU. In: Smis S, Duchateau A, Duarte A, editors. Promoting Core Higher Education Values: Perspectives from the Field. Brussels; 2019.
Distributions and Relations: A Hybrid Account. Political Studies. 2019;67(1).
Distributions and Relations: A Hybrid Account
There is a deep divide among political philosophers of an egalitarian stripe. On the one hand, there are so-called distributive egalitarians, who hold that equality obtains within a political community when each of its members enjoys an equal share of the community’s resources. On the other hand, there are so-called social egalitarians, who instead hold that equality obtains within a political community when each of its members stands in certain relations to other members of the community, such as non-domination and lack of oppression. In this article, we have three aims. Our first aim is to cast doubt on the helpfulness of characterizing the debate in this way. Our second aim is to reconstruct this debate in alternative and more precise terms, so that disagreements between advocates of either side are easier to evaluate. Our third aim is to advance a hybrid account that integrates element from both views.
Discrimination and Desert. In: Rasmussen LK, editor. The Routledge Handbook on Discrimination. Oxford: Routledge; 2017. p. 119-31.
Discrimination and Desert
Description While it has many connections to other topics in normative and applied ethics, discrimination is a central subject in philosophy in its own right. It plays a significant role in relation to many real-life complaints about unjust treatment or unjust inequalities, and it raises a number of questions in political and moral philosophy, and in legal theory. Some of these questions include: what distinguishes the concept of discrimination from the concept of differential treatment? What distinguishes direct from indirect discrimination? Is discrimination always morally wrong? What makes discrimination wrong? How should we eliminate the effects of discrimination? By covering a wide range of topics, and by doing so in a way that does not assume prior acquaintance, this handbook enables the reader to get to grips with the omnipresent issue. The Routledge Handbook of the Ethics of Discrimination is an outstanding reference source to this exciting subject and the first collection of its kind. Comprising over thirty chapters by a team of international contributors the handbook is divided into six main parts: • conceptual issues • the wrongness of discrimination • groups of ‘discriminatees’ • sites of discrimination • causes and means • history of discrimination. Essential reading for students and researchers in applied ethics and political philosophy the handbook will also be very useful for those in related fields, such as law, sociology and politics.
Multiculturalismo: Justicia correctiva, no distributiva. In: Muñoz L, editor. Aproximaciones teóricas y prácticas a la diversidad cultural. México DF: CIALC-UNAM; 2016.
NORMATIVITY, EQUAL ACCESS TO BIOTECHNOLOGIES, AND ANTI-PERFECTIONISM. Etica & Politica/Ethics & Politics. 2016;XVIII(3):383-95.
Review of Jonathan Quong’s Liberalism without Perfection. Vol 30.; 2013. (Journal of Applied Philosophy; vol 30; no 1).
Expressive Interest and the Integrity of Hate Speakers. Politics in Central Europe. 2010;6(3):18-38.
Autonomy, Free Speech and Automatic Behaviour. Res Publica. 2007;13(1):53-75.